Year of the Dragon: Through May 28th, claim free Expansion Pack (excluding Vecna Unleashed) or a Greater Elixir of Discovery! Speak to Xatheral in the Hall of Heroes. edit

Thank you for your patience while we continue to upgrade DDOwiki to the latest MediaWiki LTS version. If you find any errors on the site, please visit the Discord chat server and let us know.

Game mechanicsNewbie guideIn developmentDDO StoreSocial Media


ChallengesClassesCollectablesCraftingEnhancementsEpic DestiniesFavorFeats

GlossaryItemsMapsMonstersPlacesQuestsRacesReincarnationSkillsSpells


Please create an account or log in to remove ads, build a reputation, and unlock more editing privileges and then visit DDO wiki's IRC Chat/Discord if you need any help!

Talk:Starting an Artificer

From DDO wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hey,

I've just rolled back the changes on this page for the 2nd time; the first time i rolled it back I reviewed the removed information and found it was still game relevant, I also left a kind word on Ruder's talk page regarding this and even though he has blanked his talk page you can easily see the conversation history of how that went - he agreed removal and deletion of relevant information was not good.

Then User:Technical_13 rolled it back again and today its been removed once more with no reason provided and also removed by the IP: 127.0.0.1 and not a user at all.

And 5 mins later the same chunk of text was removed which Ruder removed yesterday that Tech undid from IP: 127.0.0.1 Not sure what to do about this - over to the admins.

Agonshar (ContributionsMessage) 13:42, May 24, 2014 (EDT)

  • Usually I wouldn't have an issue with that action. In this case however, 127.0.0.1 isn't a "real" address. It is the localhost loopback address and there shouldn't be any edit there. Any troubles with that particular address suggests that the page affected should be temporarily semi-protected and it should be immediately reported to Xevo or myself to be dealt with (I don't mind emailing Xevo myself and I know I'm on his email whitelist with no worries of being dropped in spam). ShoeMaker (Contributions Message) 19:11, May 24, 2014 (EDT)
  • Thanks ShoeMaker. Now I know. I wasn't sure if protecting or blocking was the correct course of action, and you mentioned not being around for the day. --Zav (ContributionsMessage) 19:17, May 24, 2014 (EDT)