Year of the Dragon: Through May 28th, claim free Expansion Pack (excluding Vecna Unleashed) or a Greater Elixir of Discovery! Speak to Xatheral in the Hall of Heroes. edit
Thank you for your patience while we continue to upgrade DDOwiki to the latest MediaWiki LTS version. If you find any errors on the site, please visit the Discord chat server and let us know.
Game mechanics • Newbie guide • In development • DDO Store • Social Media
Challenges • Classes • Collectables • Crafting • Enhancements • Epic Destinies • Favor • Feats
Glossary • Items • Maps • Monsters • Places • Quests • Races • Reincarnation • Skills • Spells
Please create an account or log in to remove ads, build a reputation, and unlock more editing privileges and then visit DDO wiki's IRC Chat/Discord if you need any help!
Talk:Intelligence
I personally think the page looks worse now than before the recent edit of Special:Contributions/Highlndr. I don't like the amount of bullets (too many levels, readability suffers). I don't think the first level bullets match the sub-bullets or the separation is logical (e.g. why is profane under "other" while alchemical is under "enchanted"..). I particularly detest moving the section Changes that influence the number of skill points gained to the bottom of the page - a new player looking for information will be long lost before reaching this important part.
Anyway, I do realize that some of the issues might be a personal preference thing, so whatever. I have fixed some omissions and errors in the article at least. Someone less emotionally attached to the previous format could perhaps look at this objectively. :)
--Cru121 (Contributions • Message) 15:47, March 17, 2013 (EDT)
- I'm not sure exactly what changed... I've looked at the history, and it looks like a couple words and a section was moved from the bottom to top... I do think the list depth is pushing the limit, but it is fine as it is as long as it gets no deeper. Also, I'm wondering if a table would look better.
ShoeMaker (Contributions • Message) 16:42, March 17, 2013 (EDT)
- I guess it is personal preference. I approved the edit because I thought it made it easier to read and because the Constitution page has the same structure. However, I would not be offended if it were changed back as I have no investment in the page at all.
- I guess it is personal preference. I approved the edit because I thought it made it easier to read and because the Constitution page has the same structure. However, I would not be offended if it were changed back as I have no investment in the page at all.
Susalona (Contributions • Message) 17:15, March 17, 2013 (EDT)